<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ID Integration - Activity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://journalspace.com/members/idintegration/activity/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://journalspace.com/members/idintegration/activity/feed</link>
	<description>ID Integration - Activity Feed</description>
	<pubDate></pubDate>
	<generator>http://buddypress.org/?bp-activity-version=BP_ACTIVITY_VERSION</generator>
	<language>en</language>
		
						<item>
				<title><![CDATA[ID Integration created a new blog: ID-Integration - UID Marking & Product Identificat]]></title>
				<link>http://idintegration10.journalspace.com</link>
				<pubDate>2010-12-20 07:27:35</pubDate>

				<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://journalspace.com/members/idintegration/">ID Integration</a> created a new blog: <a href="http://idintegration10.journalspace.com">ID-Integration - UID Marking & Product Identificat</a> <span class="time-since"></span>]]></description>
						</item>
					<item>
				<title><![CDATA[ID Integration wrote a new blog post: Item marking as per the new MIL-STD-130M standard]]></title>
				<link>http://idintegration.journalspace.com/2009/02/10/item-marking-as-per-the-new-mil-std-130m-standard/</link>
				<pubDate>2009-02-10 11:04:03</pubDate>

				<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://journalspace.com/members/idintegration/">ID Integration</a> wrote a new blog post: <a href="http://idintegration.journalspace.com/2009/02/10/item-marking-as-per-the-new-mil-std-130m-standard/">Item marking as per the new MIL-STD-130M standard </a> <span class="time-since"></span><blockquote>All military and defense related items needs to be standardized according to the MIL-STD-130L standard to be UID compliant. However, certain problems were observed regarding the item marking method and that’s why the Department of Defense (DoD) made certain amendment in the previous MIL-STD-130L standard and a new standard known as MIL-STD-130M was proposed on [...]</blockquote>]]></description>
						</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>

